Does Section 103 confer any special authority or discretion to the High Court beyond its usual jurisdiction in civil matters? […]
Are there any procedural safeguards in place to ensure the proper exercise of the High Court’s power under Section 103?
How does the High Court’s role in determining issues of fact align with the principles of fairness and justice? Why
Can you describe any instances where the High Court’s intervention in factual matters under Section 103 has led to significant
In what ways does Section 103 contribute to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system? Does section 105 in
Are there any notable judicial precedents or interpretations of Section 103 that shed light on its application? A: I think
What implications does the High Court’s determination of facts have on the lower courts’ decisions? Under state law, the judge
Does Section 103 provide any guidance on the procedure for the High Court to determine factual issues? To demonstrate that
Can parties request the High Court to determine specific issues of fact, or is it solely at the court’s discretion?
How does the High Court’s intervention in factual matters impact the overall judicial process? As I mentioned in my first